Ingredient Dictionary/ethylhexyl-salicylate/ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE
Tier 1 Monograph · SSOT 15 FieldsRaw .md (GEO) ↗
Synthetic

ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE

UV FilterLight Stabilizer
[EU CosIng Official Definition] Ethylhexyl Salicylate is the ester of 2-ethylhexyl alcohol and salicylic acid. It conforms to the formula:
Executive Regulatory & Safety Fact BoxAEO / GEO CITATION ANCHOR

What is ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE (CAS 118-60-5) in cosmetics and what are its global regulatory limits?

ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE (CAS No. 118-60-5) is a verified cosmetic ingredient primarily functioning as UV Filter, Light Stabilizer in topical formulations. Regulated under KR MFDS (Restricted) and EU 1223/2009 CosIng (Restricted) statutory frameworks, it is typically formulated at 2–5% within an optimal stability window of pH 4–8.

7-Track Official Regulatory Label Names Matrix

Primary Statutory Gazette Only · Zero Machine Translation
7-Track Official Statutory Label Names for ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE
Jurisdiction TrackOfficial Statutory Label NameOne-Click Copy
1. Korea (MFDS Standard Name)ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE (KR MFDS Registered)
2. Korea Former Nomenclature History——
3. European Union (EU CosIng Glossary)ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE
4. United States (US PCPC / MoCRA INCI)ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE
5. US FDA OTC Monograph Active NameOCTISALATE
6. China (NMPA IECIC Standard Name)水杨酸乙基己酯
7. Japan (JCIA Standard / MHLW Quasi-Drug)ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE (Standard INCI Reference)

Layer 1 — Statutory Regulatory Limits Across 6 Regions

Layer 1 Statutory Regulatory Limits Across 6 Regions for ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE
RegionStatusMax LimitConditions & Statutory Source
Korea (MFDS)RestrictedGMPListed in official cosmetic inventory
Europe (EU)RestrictedGMPListed in official cosmetic inventory
United States (FDA)UnregulatedGMPListed in official cosmetic inventory
China (NMPA)RestrictedGMPIECIC Entry #6413
Japan (MHLW)UnregulatedGMPListed in official cosmetic inventory
ASEAN (ACD)UnregulatedGMPListed in official cosmetic inventory
Interactive Quartile Box-Plot (Min–Q1–Median–Q3–Max)

Layer 3 Formulation Concentration Box-Plot vs. Statutory Limit

Emulsion / Creamn=5
Min 2% · Q1 5% · Median 5% · Q3 5% · Max 5%
Sunscreen / Colorn=47
Min 1.5% · Q1 4% · Median 5% · Q3 5% · Max 5%
Emulsion / Cream — Emulsion cream & lotion structural / conditioning agent
Verified Source: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=5, EVONIK 4 · ELEMENTIS 1) (cir_safety) · EVONIK 4 · ELEMENTIS 1
Typical Median: 5%

Layer 3 — Formulation Usage Guide (Quartiles n≥5) & Physicochemical Compatibility

Layer 3 Formulation Concentration Quartiles by Product Category for ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE
Formulation GroupMin – Q1 – Median – Q3 – Max (%)Role & MechanismSource ID
Group B — O/W & W/O Emulsion / Lotion / Cream2% · 5% · 5% · 5% · 5%Emulsion cream & lotion structural / conditioning agentGlobal Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=5, EVONIK 4 · ELEMENTIS 1)
Group D — Sunscreen (UV) / Color Cosmetics / Foundation1.5% · 4% · 5% · 5% · 5%Sun care & color cosmetics dispersion / sensory modifierGlobal Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=47, EVONIK 27 · GRANT 15 · SEPPIC 5)
Cutaneous Permeation Science (500 Dalton Rule)MW: Macro/Complex · LogP: N/A

Stratum Corneum Penetration Depth & Bio-Spicule Transdermal Delivery

Stratum Corneum (Brick & Mortar Barrier · 10–20 µm)500 Da Molecular Weight Cutoff BarrierViable Epidermis (Keratinocytes & Melanocytes · 50–100 µm)Target for Brightening (Tyrosinase/Melanosome) & Barrier LipidsPapillary Dermis (Fibroblasts & ECM Collagen · 150–300 µm)Target for Collagen I/III Synthesis, Peptides, PDRN & ExosomesEpidermal Passive Permeation (<500 Da)
Molecular Weight & LogP Permeation Diagnosis
Low Molecular Weight (320 Da ≤ 500 Da) — Passive Permeation Feasible

Under passive topical application, molecules diffuse tortuously through intercellular lipids. Hydrophilic compounds >500 Da remain primarily on the outer stratum corneum.

Estimated Target Depth
40–90 µm
Optimal Delivery System
Polyol Enhancer / Serum
Colloid Interface, pH Spectrum & Thermal Stability

pH Stability Window (0–14), Thermal Limit & HLB Colloidal Phase Behavior

Water or glycol phase soluble/dispersible
Optimal Formulation pH Stability Window (0–14)pH 4.0 – 8.0
0245.5791114

Outside pH 4–8, risk of hydrolysis, viscosity loss, or ionic dissociation increases.

Maximum Thermal Processing Limit (°C)≤ 50°C
25°C45°C60°C75°C85°C100°C

Thermally stable up to 50°C during standard emulsification.

HLB Scale (0–20) & Colloidal Micelle / Lamellar Phase Simulator
O/W Oil-in-Water Micelle Emulsion (Lotion / Cream)
HLB 11.5
W/O (3–6)Lamellar (8–10.5)O/W Emulsion (11–15)Solubilizer (15–19)O/W Droplet
Biochemical Signaling & Mechanism Pathway

Cellular & Molecular Target Mechanism Flow

1. Epidermal Interaction→ Upregulation / Activation
Intercellular Lipid & Hydration Matrix
→
TEWL Reduction & Barrier Conditioning
2. Homeostasis Modulation⊣ Inhibition / Blockade
Oxidative Stress (ROS) & Irritant Cascade
⊣
Cutaneous Soothing & Homeostasis
Formulation Ontology Radial Graph

Interactive Synergy Pairings (Solid) & Incompatibility Warnings (Dashed)

+ GLYCERIN+ CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TR…+ TOCOPHEROL✕ Verify phase compati…ETHYLHEXYL SALICYL…
Interactive Node Guide

Click any green synergy node to jump directly to its monograph, or click a red dashed node to inspect the chemical incompatibility mechanism.

Nominative Trade Name References (Trademark Act Art. 90(1)(2))
ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE

Trade names are provided strictly for descriptive identification of polymer/emulsifier grades under Article 90(1)(2) of the Trademark Act. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.

Academic & Toxicological Synthesis

Tier 1 Synthesis

Synthesized strictly from peer-reviewed PubMed abstracts and official toxicological dossiers linked to this ingredient.

■ [1. Chemical Identity & International Labeling Nomenclature] - INCI Name: ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE | CAS No.: 118-60-5 | EC No.: 204-263-4 - Origin: SYNTHETIC | Functions: , - Physicochemical Profile: Formula | MW /(Polymer/Complex) | / | Ionic Nature: non-ionic | CosIng/MFDS - Official Regional Label Names: US [ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE] · EU [ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE] · CN [水杨酸乙基己酯] · JP [-] · JP Quasi-Drug [-] ■ [2. Dermatological Mechanism of Action & Functional Role] - Ethylhexyl Salicylate is the ester of 2-ethylhexyl alcohol and salicylic acid. It conforms to the formula: Classified under origin 'synthetic', it acts within the cosmetic vehicle or stratum corneum to deliver , performance and structural formulation stability. ■ [3. Global 6-Jurisdiction Regulatory Status & Safety Limits (Layer 1 & Layer 2)] - Regional Summary: KR: RESTRICTED | EU: RESTRICTED | US: NONE | CN: RESTRICTED | JP: NONE | ASEAN: NONE (CN IECIC (2025) Entry No. 6413 (水杨酸乙基己酯)) - [CN / COMPOSITION / limited] (Max 5%): - [CN / COMPOSITION / limited] (Max 5%): - [KR / COMPOSITION / limited] (Max 5%): - Official Safety & Historical Use Concentration (Layer 2): Quantum satis (QS) within standard cosmetic safety margins ■ [4. Formulation Dosage Guide by Product Category (Layer 3-A)] - [emulsion_cream] Typical range: 2.0 ~ 5.0% (Median 5.0%, Ref: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=5, EVONIK 4 · ELEMENTIS 1)) — Emulsion cream & lotion structural / conditioning agent - [sun_color] Typical range: 1.5 ~ 5.0% (Median 5.0%, Ref: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=47, EVONIK 27 · GRANT 15 · SEPPIC 5)) — Sun care & color cosmetics dispersion / sensory modifier ■ [5. Formulation Engineering, Stability & Incompatibility Matrix (Layer 3-B)] - Addition Phase: Water Phase or Cool-down Phase (< 45°C) - Optimal pH Range: pH 4.0 ~ 8.0 | Max Process Temp: Max 50°C | Electrolyte Tolerance: MEDIUM - Incompatibility / Caution: Verify phase compatibility under extreme pH or high electrolyte loads - Synergy Pairings: GLYCERIN, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, TOCOPHEROL | Reference Trade Names: ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE ■ [6. Peer-Reviewed Literature & Official Compendia Evidence] - PMID 29981751 (2019, J Am Acad Dermatol): Review of environmental effects of oxybenzone and other sunscreen active ingredients. - PMID 39499337 (2024, Arch Dermatol Res): Facial disbiosis and UV filters. - PMID 40744385 (2025, Regul Toxicol Pharmacol): Estimates of skin and blood concentrations of UV-filters: Insights from in vitro skin experiments.

Linked Peer-Reviewed Literature (NIH PubMed) (14)

Review of environmental effects of oxybenzone and other sunscreen active ingredients. [PMID: 29981751 · 2019]
Schneider SL, Lim HW · J Am Acad Dermatol (2019)

With increasing awareness regarding the risks of sunburn, photoaging, and skin cancer, the use of sunscreens has increased. Organic and inorganic filters are used in sunscreen products worldwide. Concerns have been raised regarding the environmental effects of commonly used organic ultraviolet (UV) filters, including oxybenzone (benzophenone-3), 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, octocrylene, and octinoxate (ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate). Studies have identified UV filters such as oxybenzone, octocrylene, octinoxate, and ethylhexyl salicylate in almost all water sources around the world and have commented that these filters are not easily removed by common wastewater treatment plant techniques. Additionally, in laboratory settings, oxybenzone has been implicated specifically as a possible contributor to coral reef bleaching. Furthermore, UV filters such as 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, oxybenzone, octocrylene, and octinoxate have been identified in various species of fish worldwide, which has possible consequences for the food chain. As dermatologists, it is important for us to continue to emphasize the public health impact of excessive sun exposure and advise our patients about proper photoprotection practice, which consists of seeking shade, wearing photoprotective clothing (including hats and sunglasses), and applying appropriate sunscreens.

Facial disbiosis and UV filters. [PMID: 39499337 · 2024]
Arantes AB, Rosa RT, de Oliveira NS, Bianchini LF, Rached RN, Johann ACBR, Weber SH, Murakami FS, Maluf DF, Rosa EAR · Arch Dermatol Res (2024)

Acne is a multifactorial inflammatory disease with a robust microbial component and numerous correlations with dysbiosis states. Furthermore, various factors are recognized as triggers for skin dysbiosis, including the use of certain cosmetics. Based on these arguments, we hypothesized that using photoprotective formulations could trigger dysbiosis and the occurrence of acne manifestations. To verify this assumption, six volunteers between 19 and 23 years of age, meeting all the inclusion criteria, received two applications a day of a non-commercial sunscreen formulation developed with the sun filters ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, ethylhexyl salicylate, methyl anthranilate, and octocrylene dispersed in a base gel, with an estimated protection factor of 28.8. The pure base gel was used as a control. The samples were applied to an area delimited by a standard template (15 cm 2 ) in an amount corresponding to 30&#xa0;mg (2&#xa0;mg cm 2 ) for ten days. At two points in time, pre- and post-sample applications, the facial skin surface was swabbed to collect extracted DNA and processed to verify divergent degrees of 16&#xa0;S RNA coding sequences. The data obtained allowed us to determine the abundance of different bacterial entities at the genus and species levels. The results showed that critical species of the acne process, such as Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis, seem to tolerate the evaluated formulation well and are not significantly affected by the formulation, suggesting no interference of its use concerning dysbiosis induction. These findings refute the idea that photoprotectors may cause skin dysbiosis in men.

Estimates of skin and blood concentrations of UV-filters: Insights from in vitro skin experiments. [PMID: 40744385 · 2025]
De Luca HP, Boudon S, Odermatt A, Schenk L, Hopf NB · Regul Toxicol Pharmacol (2025)

Organic ultraviolet (UV) filters mitigate radiation transmission through the skin; however, uncertainties persist regarding their ability to cross the skin barrier and induce toxicity. Our aim was to use published in vitro skin permeation studies to predict UV-filter concentrations in blood and skin. In our review, we identified 35 papers reporting in vitro skin permeation of the 12 most used organic UV-filters. We estimated the UV-filters' theoretical concentrations in blood and skin layers for two case scenarios and compared them with in vivo data. Five of the UV-filters penetrated skin as the parent compound, among these the highest estimated blood concentration was for benzophenone 4 (419&#xa0;mg/L). These were overestimated (up to 100 times) compared to the reported in vivo results. Ten of the UV-filters permeated skin, among these ethylhexyl salicylate had the highest estimated skin concentration (15.99&#xa0;g/cm 3 ). Results from literature were inconsistent, likely due to different experimental in vitro methods. Although skin can metabolize chemicals, none of the included studies quantified potential UV-filter metabolites. We recommend future in vitro skin permeation studies to standardize the methods according to existing guidelines (including quantification of the metabolites) and screen UV-filters for possible skin absorption followed by a risk evaluation.

Pyroptosis- and Necroptosis-Related Signaling in Salicylate UV Absorber-Induced Toxicity: Implications for Sustainable Chemistry and Human Health [PMID: 42278310 · 2026]
He C, Wang Y, Lin J, Yu Z, Shi Y, Cheng J, Jiang Y, Hu L · Int J Mol Sci (2026)

As emerging global environmental contaminants, organic ultraviolet absorbers (OUVAs) are widely used in personal care formulations and exhibit environmental persistence and potential bioaccumulation. Among these compounds, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate (EHS) and homosalate (HMS) are the most frequently used salicylate-type UV filters in cosmetic formulations. Although an increasing number of studies have demonstrated their environmental hazards, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying their cytotoxicity in mammalian systems, a fundamental knowledge gap for both human health protection and the development of more environmentally friendly consumer goods. In this study, we used mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs, 3T6) and zebrafish as models to assess the toxicological phenotypes of EHS and HMS in vitro and in vivo, respectively. We found that both EHS and HMS induced cellular damage characterized by oxidative stress, disrupted intracellular calcium homeostasis, mitochondrial impairment, and DNA damage. Importantly, molecular analyses further suggested the concurrent activation of two distinct regulated cell death programs: pyroptosis, as suggested by Caspase-11 -mediated GSDMD cleavage, and necroptosis, as suggested by ZBP1-RIPK3-Caspase-8 -mediated MLKL phosphorylation. The in vitro data have been partially validated at the level of gene expression and in developmental toxicity in the zebrafish model, providing some in vivo phenotypic and molecular correlates. While the upstream events were experimentally verified, the causal links among them remain to be further elucidated. Taken together, this work suggested that OUVA-induced toxicity is not limited to isolated oxidative damage, but may also involve the activation of two different cell death programs. These findings provide important molecular clues to understanding the potential health and ecological risks of widely used UV filters and offer a scientific basis for their more environmentally friendly safety evaluation and regulatory management, which are crucial for advancing more sustainable chemistry and safer consumer goods.

Laser-induced hyperspectral fluorescence for spatio-chemical detection of sunscreen contaminants in food-grade sea salt using sparse PCA-SVM analysis [PMID: 42084616 · 2026]
Ebrahem M, Hosni MI, Abdallah A, Mahmoud A · Environ Geochem Health (2026)

Sea salt increasingly harbors organic contaminants from personal care products, yet current monitoring methods lack spatial resolution and require destructive sampling. This study introduces an innovative analytical framework integrating Laser-Induced Fluorescence (LIF) Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) with machine learning for the rapid, non-destructive detection of sunscreen residues on salt crystals. To simulate contamination, seawater from the Mediterranean coast (Alexandria, Egypt) was spiked to achieve a 10&#xa0;mg/L sunscreen concentration within the seawater matrix prior to crystallization; this formulation contained Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate, Homosalate, and Ethylhexyl Salicylate. A SOC710 HS camera (128 bands) acquired fluorescence data under 450&#xa0;nm laser excitation. Raw data underwent preprocessing and dimensionality reduction via Sparse Principal Component Analysis (Sparse PCA, &#x3bb;&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.5, k&#x2009;=&#x2009;4 components, 73.4% sparsity). A Support Vector Machine (SVM) with an RBF kernel was trained on these sparse features. Performance evaluation employed tenfold stratified cross-validation, an 80-20 holdout test on ROI-based spectra, and independent sample validation against manually annotated pixel-wise ground-truth masks. While ROI-based tests yielded near-perfect accuracy under ideal conditions, full-image evaluation achieved &#x2248;96% pixel-wise accuracy (precision&#x2009;&#x2248;&#x2009;0.99, recall&#x2009;&#x2248;&#x2009;0.95, F1&#x2009;&#x2248;&#x2009;0.97), providing a realistic estimate under heterogeneous conditions. Full-image classification mapped widespread contamination (57.8% of pixels), whereas an independently prepared clean salt sample produced zero false positives. The integrated Sparse PCA-SVM framework transforms fluorescence-imaging data into spatio-chemical maps, simultaneously revealing contaminant presence and spatial distribution on salt surfaces, thereby offering a powerful paradigm for the interpretable monitoring of organic pollutants in food materials.

Occurrence of twelve UV filters and evidence of cis-octinoxate formation in Adriatic coastal waters: Environmental implications [PMID: 41518963 · 2026]
Zulfiqar H, Llompart M, Casti&#xf1;eira-Landeira A, Coralli I, Vassura I, Fabbri D · Mar Pollut Bull (2026)

UV filters used in personal care products are increasingly recognised as emerging contaminants due to their persistence and ecological risks. Detected in aquatic systems at concentrations from ng&#xa0;L -1 to &#x3bc;g&#xa0;L -1 , their monitoring is essential for environmental risk assessment but challenging because of their diverse physicochemical properties, requiring sensitive analytical methods. This study optimised a solid-phase extraction gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (SPE-GC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous determination of twelve UV filters in marine waters. The method showed suitable linearity, precision, and recoveries, with detection limits below 1&#xa0;ng&#xa0;L -1 . Seawater samples collected along the Adriatic coast (Rimini and Riccione, Italy) during peak recreational activity were analysed. All twelve UV filters were detected, with octocrylene (up to 23,100&#xa0;ng&#xa0;L -1 ), homosalate (up to 16,400&#xa0;ng&#xa0;L -1 ), and ethylhexyl salicylate (up to 10,900&#xa0;ng&#xa0;L -1 ) being most abundant. Trans-2-Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (E-EHMC, the trans isomer of octinoxate, 13-1474&#xa0;ng&#xa0;L -1 ) occurred consistently with its isomer Z-EHMC (cis-octinoxate), contributing 18-64&#xa0;% of total (E&#xa0;+&#xa0;Z)-EHMC, suggesting in situ photochemical conversion, since the cis form is negligible in cosmetic products. Benzophenone, ethylhexyl dimethyl PABA, 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, benzyl salicylate, and isoamyl methoxycinnamate were found at lower yet relevant concentrations. UV filters banned under European regulations, such as menthyl anthranilate and etocrylene, were absent or barely detected. This work provides the first data on sunscreen UV filters in Adriatic coastal waters and the first quantitative evidence of Z-EHMC in environmental waters, highlighting its in situ formation and contributing to understanding their environmental fate and risks.

Amended Safety Assessment of Salicylic Acid and Salicylates as Used in Cosmetics [PMID: 41243163 · 2025]
Johnson W, Zhu J, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Hill RA, Klaassen CD, Liebler DC, Marks JG, Shank RC, Slaga TJ, Snyder PW, Fiume MM, Heldreth B · Int J Toxicol (2025)

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) reviewed the safety of Salicylic Acid and 17 salicylates; 15 of these ingredients were previously reviewed by the Panel, and 3 are reviewed herein for the first time. Some of the reported functions in cosmetics for ingredients in this group are hair and skin conditioning agents, and, less frequently, preservatives and fragrance ingredients. Upon review of relevant new data, including frequency and concentration of use, and consideration of data from the previous CIR report, the Panel concluded that these ingredients are safe in cosmetics in the present practices of use and concentration described in the safety assessment when formulated to be non-irritating and non-sensitizing, which may be based on a quantitative risk assessment (QRA).

Nationwide occurrence of emerging benzophenone, benzotriazole, salicylate and triazine ultraviolet filters in coastal sediment of China: Spatial distribution, source and ecological risk [PMID: 41101667 · 2025]
Tang Z, Wu Z, Jia X, Liu X, Pei X, Liu Z, Xiong X, Li J, Liu X, Wu C, Yao Z · Environ Res (2025)

Ultraviolet filters (UVFs), widely used in industrial and personal care products, are emerging environmental contaminants of great concern because of their persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity. Sediments are generally considered the reservoir and secondary source of UVFs, yet knowledge of the occurrence of these emerging contaminants in coastal sediments on a large geographical scale remains unknown. In this study, 31 out of 37 target UVFs were detected in 91 sediment samples collected from 43 coastal cities of China. Benzophenone UVFs exhibited the highest mean total concentration of 5374.8&#xa0;pg/g, followed by benzotriazole (3298.3&#xa0;pg/g), salicylate (3094.1&#xa0;pg/g) and triazin UVFs (61.2&#xa0;pg/g), respectively. Spatial analysis revealed significantly higher UVF concentrations ranging from 1839&#xa0;pg/g to 82,308&#xa0;pg/g in coastal sediments from the Yellow Sea compared with those of the South China Sea, the East China Sea and the Bohai Sea (p&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.05). Source apportionment indicated that the emissions from industrial productions, cosmetics and personal care products are major contributors to UVF contamination. A nationwide mass inventory identified the Liaodong Peninsula, Yangtze River Estuary, Pearl River Estuary, and north-east Hainan Province as UVF accumulation hotspots, influenced by tourism, industrial activities, and ocean currents. Ecological risk assessment showed that seven UVFs, including Benzophenone-7 (BP-7), 2-(benzotriazol-2-yl)-4-tert-butylphenol (UV-PS), 2-tert-butyl-6-(5-chlorobenzotriazol-2-yl)-4-methylphenol (UV-326), 2,4-ditert-butyl-6-(5-chlorobenzotriazol-2-yl) phenol (UV-327), 2-(benzotriazol-2-yl)-4-(2,4,4-trimethylpentan-2-yl) phenol (UV-329), 2-Ethylhexyl salicylate (EHS) and Homosalate (HMS), posed significant ecological risks (RQ&#xa0;&gt;&#xa0;0.1) in coastal sediments. This work delivers the first nationwide assessment of four classes of UVFs contamination in coastal sediments of China, providing critical data for their environmental mitigation and management.

Marine sediments microbes degrade a limited repertoire of organic UV filters [PMID: 40782226 · 2025]
Fagervold SK, Roh&#xe9;e C, Lebaron P · Environ Sci Pollut Res Int (2025)

Understanding the processes that organic UV filters undergo in coastal and marine environments is crucial for assessing their long-term environmental risks. One key process is degradation by microorganisms in sediments. This study aimed to determine whether coastal marine sediments harbor microorganisms capable of degrading organic UV filters. Sediment from Toulon Harbor was tested for its degradation potential with respect to 12 different organic UV filters. Sediment microcosms showed degradation activity towards benzophenone-3 (BP3), 2-ethylhexyl salicylate (ES), and homosalate (HS) after 12&#xa0;days. However, no degradation was observed for butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (BM), octocrylene (OC), diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate (DHHB), drometrizole trisiloxane (DTS), phenylene bis-diphenyltriazine (TriAsorB), bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine (BEMT), methylene bis-benzotriazolyl tetramethylbutylphenol (MBBT), diethylhexyl butamido triazone (DBT), or ethylhexyl triazone (ET), even after 100&#xa0;days of incubation. Two degrading strains were isolated from the microcosms: a Rhodococcus strain degrading ES and a Microbacterium strain capable of degrading HS. Despite substantial efforts, the microorganism thought to be responsible for BP3 degradation could not be isolated. This work demonstrates that microorganisms in coastal sediments can degrade a limited range of organic UV filters.

Organic ultraviolet filters in the blubber of two free-ranging deep-diving cetacean species [PMID: 40712201 · 2025]
&#xcd;&#xf1;iguez E, Montesdeoca-Esponda S, Alves F, Sosa-Ferrera Z, Kaufmann M, Cordeiro N, Dinis A · Environ Pollut (2025)

The increasing use of personal care products has led to the widespread of organic UV filters (oUVFs) in marine ecosystems, yet their occurrence and potential impacts on pelagic and deep-sea environments remain unclear. This study assessed oUVFs contamination in the blubber of two deep-diving cetacean species -the short-finned pilot whale (Globicephala macrorhynchus) and the sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus)-off Madeira Island, Eastern North Atlantic. Using microwave-assisted extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS, four of eleven targeted oUVFs were detected in blubber: homosalate, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, octocrylene, and methylene bis-benzotriazole (UV-360). Concentrations reached up to 352.3&#xa0;ng/g wet weight (w.w.) in pilot whales and 1505&#xa0;ng/g w.w. in sperm whales. Detection frequencies were higher in pilot whales (60-100&#xa0;%) than in sperm whales (30-50&#xa0;%). This study provides the first evidence of UV-360 concentration in cetaceans. These findings suggest that pilot whales' higher site fidelity in Madeiran waters may increase exposure to oUVF, while sperm whales may accumulate oUVFs through benthopelagic feeding at higher trophic levels. These results highlight the potential for oUVF to disperse into deep marine ecosystems and underscore the importance of monitoring emerging contaminants in oceanic apex predators.

Human exposure and health risks to ultraviolet filters in personal care products marketed in China [PMID: 40383423 · 2025]
Gao M, Liu Y, Gao L, Weng J, Ai Q, Yang Q, Liu Y, Xu M, Zhao B, Zheng M · Environ Res (2025)

Ultraviolet (UV) filters are emerging contaminants of great concern that are widely used in personal care products (PCPs). In this study, the concentrations of 15 UV filters in six types of PCP marketed in China were analyzed and the health risks posed by their internal and external exposure were evaluated. 2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC) presented the highest median concentration of 3150&#xa0;ng/g in PCPs, followed by 2-ethylhexyl salicylate (109&#xa0;ng/g) and octocrylene (OC, 95.1&#xa0;ng/g). The total UV filter concentrations were considerably higher in sunscreens than other PCPs. Total external dermal exposure to UV filters in sunscreen was higher than the total estimated daily dietary intake of UV filters. A physiologically based toxicokinetic model to predict internal UV filter concentrations after sunscreen application for 1&#xa0;d showed that EHMC had the highest predicted maximum concentration in venous blood at 0.0770&#xa0;ng/mL, only one order of magnitude lower than the reference dose. The predicted maximum UV filter concentrations were higher for high-lipid-content tissues than venous blood, consistent with UV filters being lipophilic. OC, EHMC and homosalate made large contributions to the toxic activity assay results, and thus should receive more attention than other UV filters.

Mode of action approach supports a lack of carcinogenic potential of six organic UV filters [PMID: 40208192 · 2025]
Cohen SM, Boobis AR, Jacobson-Kram D, Schoeny R, Rosol TJ, Williams GM, Kaminski NE, Eichenbaum GM, Guengerich FP, Nash JF · Crit Rev Toxicol (2025)

Ultraviolet (UV) filters, the active ingredients in sunscreens, have been used for several decades to reduce the risk of acute and chronic damage to the skin from solar UV radiation, which can lead to skin cancer. Based on recent clinical studies showing that certain UV filters are absorbed systemically at low levels in humans, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has requested supplementing existing safety data with preclinical studies including oral and dermal 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies. Although the conduct of 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies has been the standard approach for evaluating the carcinogenic potential of chemicals and new drugs for approximately 6 decades, there are multiple examples showing that such studies are not predictive of human cancer risk. Given these concerns with 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies, we have developed and applied an alternative approach for supplementing existing data related to carcinogenic potential for six of the most commonly used UV filters in sunscreen products (i.e. avobenzone, ensulizole, homosalate, octinoxate, octisalate, and octocrylene). This approach evaluates their mode of action (MOA) based on in&#xa0;vivo , in&#xa0;vitro , and in silico data combined with an assessment of exposure margins. This approach is based on the substantial progress in understanding the MOAs that are responsible for tumor induction in humans. It is consistent with those being developed by the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) and other health authorities to replace 2-year carcinogenicity studies given their limitations and questionable biological relevance to humans. The available data for the six UV filters show that they are not genotoxic and show no evidence of biologically relevant carcinogenic MOAs. Furthermore, their systemic exposure levels in humans fall well below concentrations at which they have biologic activity. In conclusion, these data support the continued safe use of these six filters in sunscreen products.

Single-species tests fall short: broadening toxicity assessments of organic UV filters on marine microalgae [PMID: 40181201 · 2025]
Clergeaud F, Thorel E, Lebaron P, Giraudo M · Environ Toxicol Chem (2025)

Sunscreen products, essential for photoprotection, introduce organic UV filters into aquatic environments, raising concerns about their ecotoxicological impacts. This study evaluates the sensitivity of seven marine microalgae species spanning diverse taxonomic groups to six organic UV filters (benzophenone-3, butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane, ethylhexyl triazone, homosalate, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, and octocrylene). Growth rate and chlorophyll a fluorescence were analyzed after 72&#x2009;hr exposures at concentrations of 10, 100, and 1,000&#x2009;&#xb5;g/L. Growth rate was revealed to be the most sensitive indicator, with significant interspecies variability in response to UV filters. Results revealed that Tisochrysis lutea exhibited better sensitivity than the commonly used Phaeodactylum tricornutum, which demonstrated low sensitivity across endpoints. Among UV filters, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate and homosalate were the most toxic, significantly affecting growth and fluorescence in multiple species. Interestingly, growth inhibition often coincided with increased fluorescence, suggesting species-specific compensatory mechanisms. These findings underscore the limitations of relying solely on P. tricornutum in standardized toxicity tests and advocate for the inclusion of sensitive species to improve ecological relevance. Integrating growth and fluorescence metrics in high-throughput assays could advance risk assessment methodologies for emerging contaminants like UV filters.

Enhancing Photoprotection and Mitigating Ex Vivo Stratum Corneum Oxidative Stress: A Multifunctional Strategy Combining Rosmarinic Acid with UVB Filters [PMID: 40227214 · 2025]
Macedo PIS, Pinto CASO, Hiraishi CF, Marques GA, Escudeiro CC, Pessoa FVLS, Greg&#xf3;rio J, Rosado C, Velasco MVR, Baby AR · Antioxidants (Basel) (2025)

Exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a major contributor to skin injury, including sunburn, photoaging, and augmented risk of skin cancer, primarily through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that induce oxidative stress. Rosmarinic acid (RA), a natural phenolic compound with antioxidant and several other biological properties, has shown promise in mitigating such damage when incorporated into sunscreens. We evaluated RA's possible interactions and potential to enhance the efficacy of three worldwide known UVB filters-ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EHMC), octocrylene (OCT), and ethylhexyl salicylate (EHS). The performance of sunscreens with and without RA (0.1% w / w ) was analyzed through in vitro and in vivo photoprotective assessments. The HPLC-TBARS-EVSC (high-performance liquid chromatography-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances-ex vivo stratum corneum) protocol, which quantified oxidative stress reduction in the human stratum corneum, was also used. The in vitro photoprotective assays showed that RA had distinct levels of interactions with the UVB filters. When associated with EHMC, RA exclusively acted in the UVB range (SPF-enhancing effect). Remarkably, for EHS, RA contributed to a higher efficacy profile in the total UV spectrum. OCT-RA was the sample that reached the highest critical wavelength value parallelly to OCT, boosting the in vivo SPF by more than 157% in comparison to OCT. However, its in vitro SPF performance was not affected by the RA addition, being comparable to OCT, EHS, and EHS-RA. Furthermore, the HPLC-TBARS-EVSC protocol highlighted RA's ability to reduce lipid peroxidation, with OCT-RA exhibiting the most notable protective effect. These findings underscore RA's potential as a multifunctional additive in sunscreen systems, enhancing both photoprotection and oxidative stress mitigation.

Frequently Asked Questions (AEO Position 0)

Q1. What are the official 7-track regulatory label names for ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE?
Standard label names are US PCPC INCI: 'ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE', EU CosIng: 'ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE', KR MFDS: 'ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE (KR MFDS Registered)', CN NMPA IECIC: '水杨酸乙基己酯', and JP JCIA: 'ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE'.
Q2. Is ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE restricted or permitted in EU, US, KR, CN, and JP cosmetics?
Regulatory status summary across 6 jurisdictions — KR: restricted, EU: restricted, US: none, CN: restricted, JP: none, ASEAN: none.
Q3. What is the typical formulation concentration and optimal pH window for ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE?
In emulsion_cream systems, ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE is typically formulated between 2% and 5% (median 5%), with an optimal stability window of pH 4–8.
Q4. What are the known formulation incompatibilities and synergy pairings for ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE?
Recommended synergy pairings include GLYCERIN, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, TOCOPHEROL. Key incompatibilities to avoid: Verify phase compatibility under extreme pH or high electrolyte loads.