Ingredient Dictionary/1-2-hexanediol/1,2-HEXANEDIOL
Tier 1 Monograph · SSOT 15 FieldsRaw .md (GEO) ↗
Synthetic

1,2-HEXANEDIOL

Skin ConditioningSolvent
Executive Regulatory & Safety Fact BoxAEO / GEO CITATION ANCHOR

What is 1,2-HEXANEDIOL (CAS 6920-22-5) in cosmetics and what are its global regulatory limits?

1,2-HEXANEDIOL (CAS No. 6920-22-5) is a verified cosmetic ingredient primarily functioning as Skin Conditioning, Solvent in topical formulations. Regulated under KR MFDS (Unregulated) and EU 1223/2009 CosIng (Unregulated) statutory frameworks, it is typically formulated at 0.5–3% within an optimal stability window of pH 3–10.

7-Track Official Regulatory Label Names Matrix

Primary Statutory Gazette Only · Zero Machine Translation
7-Track Official Statutory Label Names for 1,2-HEXANEDIOL
Jurisdiction TrackOfficial Statutory Label NameOne-Click Copy
1. Korea (MFDS Standard Name)1,2-HEXANEDIOL (KR MFDS Registered)
2. Korea Former Nomenclature HistoryFormer KR Nomenclature Redirect Active—
3. European Union (EU CosIng Glossary)1,2-HEXANEDIOL
4. United States (US PCPC / MoCRA INCI)1,2-HEXANEDIOL
5. US FDA OTC Monograph Active Name— (Cosmetic Inactive / Non-OTC)—
6. China (NMPA IECIC Standard Name)1,2-己二醇
7. Japan (JCIA Standard / MHLW Quasi-Drug)1,2-ヘキサンジオール · [QD: 1,2-ヘキサンジオール]

Layer 1 — Statutory Regulatory Limits Across 6 Regions

Layer 1 Statutory Regulatory Limits Across 6 Regions for 1,2-HEXANEDIOL
RegionStatusMax LimitConditions & Statutory Source
Korea (MFDS)UnregulatedGMPListed in official cosmetic inventory
Europe (EU)UnregulatedGMPListed in official cosmetic inventory
United States (FDA)UnregulatedGMPListed in official cosmetic inventory
China (NMPA)Listed / AllowedGMPIECIC Entry #4
Japan (MHLW)UnregulatedGMPListed in official cosmetic inventory
ASEAN (ACD)UnregulatedGMPListed in official cosmetic inventory

Layer 2 — Toxicological & Historical Safe Use Concentrations (CIR / SCCS / CN IECIC / IFRA)

“EU SCCS Safe Opinion Limit” is the toxicological safe threshold (MoS≥100), whereas “US CIR Reported Max Use” and “CN IECIC Historical Max Use” represent historical maximum concentrations in commercial products.

Layer 2 Toxicological & Historical Safe Use Concentrations for 1,2-HEXANEDIOL
Assessment BasisApplication ScopeConcentration RangeVerdict & Dossier Reference
US CIR Reported Max Usetotal0.00005~10%Safe (MoS≥100)116_tent_capryl.pdf ()
US CIR Reported Max Usebath0.0004~0.2%Safe (MoS≥100)116_tent_capryl.pdf ()
US CIR Reported Max Useeye0.3~0.7%Safe (MoS≥100)116_tent_capryl.pdf ()
US CIR Reported Max Usedermal0.00005~10%Safe (MoS≥100)116_tent_capryl.pdf ()
US CIR Reported Max Usehair0.0003~0.3%Safe (MoS≥100)116_tent_capryl.pdf ()
US CIR Reported Max Useleave_on0.2~10%Safe (MoS≥100)117_draft_cg.pdf ()
US CIR Reported Max Useingestion0.3~0.3%Safe (MoS≥100)119_final_12glc.pdf ()
US CIR Reported Max Usespray10~10%Safe (MoS≥100)119_final_12glc.pdf ()
US CIR Reported Max Usenail0.4~0.4%Safe (MoS≥100)119_final_12glc.pdf ()
US CIR Reported Max Usemucous0.3~0.3%Safe (MoS≥100)119_final_12glc.pdf ()
US CIR Reported Max Userinse_off0.00005~0.8%Safe (MoS≥100)119_final_12glc.pdf ()
CN IECIC Historical Max Useleave_on≤ 15%Safe (MoS≥100)NMPA IECIC (2025) Entry 00004 (2025)
CN IECIC Historical Max Userinse_off≤ 10%Safe (MoS≥100)NMPA IECIC (2025) Entry 00004 (2025)
Interactive Quartile Box-Plot (Min–Q1–Median–Q3–Max)

Layer 3 Formulation Concentration Box-Plot vs. Statutory Limit

Aqueous Serum / Ampoulen=148
Min 0.5% · Q1 1.5% · Median 2% · Q3 2.2% · Max 3%
Emulsion / Creamn=186
Min 0.5% · Q1 1.2% · Median 1.8% · Q3 2% · Max 2.5%
Aqueous Serum / Ampoule — pH-independent antimicrobial humectant & solvent booster
Verified Source: CIR Alkane Diols Safety Assessment & CN IECIC (cir_safety) · Symrise 52 · Evonik 48 · SEPPIC 48
Typical Median: 2%

Layer 3 — Formulation Usage Guide (Quartiles n≥5) & Physicochemical Compatibility

Layer 3 Formulation Concentration Quartiles by Product Category for 1,2-HEXANEDIOL
Formulation GroupMin – Q1 – Median – Q3 – Max (%)Role & MechanismSource ID
Group A — Aqueous Toner / Serum / Ampoule0.5% · 1.5% · 2% · 2.2% · 3%pH-independent antimicrobial humectant & solvent boosterCIR Alkane Diols Safety Assessment & CN IECIC
Group B — O/W & W/O Emulsion / Lotion / Cream0.5% · 1.2% · 1.8% · 2% · 2.5%Preservative-free system main diol boosterCIR 1,2-Hexanediol Assessment
Cutaneous Permeation Science (500 Dalton Rule)MW: 118.17 Da · LogP: 0.6

Stratum Corneum Penetration Depth & Bio-Spicule Transdermal Delivery

Stratum Corneum (Brick & Mortar Barrier · 10–20 µm)500 Da Molecular Weight Cutoff BarrierViable Epidermis (Keratinocytes & Melanocytes · 50–100 µm)Target for Brightening (Tyrosinase/Melanosome) & Barrier LipidsPapillary Dermis (Fibroblasts & ECM Collagen · 150–300 µm)Target for Collagen I/III Synthesis, Peptides, PDRN & ExosomesEpidermal Passive Permeation (<500 Da)
Molecular Weight & LogP Permeation Diagnosis
Low Molecular Weight (118.17 Da ≤ 500 Da) — Passive Permeation Feasible

Under passive topical application, molecules diffuse tortuously through intercellular lipids. Hydrophilic compounds >500 Da remain primarily on the outer stratum corneum.

Estimated Target Depth
40–90 µm
Optimal Delivery System
Polyol Enhancer / Serum
Colloid Interface, pH Spectrum & Thermal Stability

pH Stability Window (0–14), Thermal Limit & HLB Colloidal Phase Behavior

Miscible with water, glycols, alcohols
Optimal Formulation pH Stability Window (0–14)pH 3.0 – 10.0
0245.5791114

Outside pH 3–10, risk of hydrolysis, viscosity loss, or ionic dissociation increases.

Maximum Thermal Processing Limit (°C)≤ 80°C
25°C45°C60°C75°C85°C100°C

Thermally stable up to 80°C during standard emulsification.

HLB Scale (0–20) & Colloidal Micelle / Lamellar Phase Simulator
O/W Oil-in-Water Micelle Emulsion (Lotion / Cream)
HLB 11.5
W/O (3–6)Lamellar (8–10.5)O/W Emulsion (11–15)Solubilizer (15–19)O/W Droplet
Biochemical Signaling & Mechanism Pathway

Cellular & Molecular Target Mechanism Flow

1. Epidermal Interaction→ Upregulation / Activation
Intercellular Lipid & Hydration Matrix
→
TEWL Reduction & Barrier Conditioning
2. Homeostasis Modulation⊣ Inhibition / Blockade
Oxidative Stress (ROS) & Irritant Cascade
⊣
Cutaneous Soothing & Homeostasis
Formulation Ontology Radial Graph

Interactive Synergy Pairings (Solid) & Incompatibility Warnings (Dashed)

+ ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN+ HYDROXYACETOPHENONE+ PENTYLENE GLYCOL+ CAPRYLYL GLYCOL✕ Concentrations > 2.2…1,2-HEXANEDIOL
Interactive Node Guide

Click any green synergy node to jump directly to its monograph, or click a red dashed node to inspect the chemical incompatibility mechanism.

Nominative Trade Name References (Trademark Act Art. 90(1)(2))
SymDiol® 68 (with Caprylyl Glycol)Hydrolite® 6

Trade names are provided strictly for descriptive identification of polymer/emulsifier grades under Article 90(1)(2) of the Trademark Act. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.

Academic & Toxicological Synthesis

Tier 1 Synthesis

Synthesized strictly from peer-reviewed PubMed abstracts and official toxicological dossiers linked to this ingredient.

■ [1. Chemical Identity & International Labeling Nomenclature] - INCI Name: 1,2-HEXANEDIOL | CAS No.: 6920-22-5 | EC No.: 230-029-6 - Origin: SYNTHETIC | Functions: Skin Conditioning, - Physicochemical Profile: Formula C6H14O2 | MW 118.17 g/mol | LogP 0.6 | Ionic Nature: non-ionic | PubChem CID 13583 - Official Regional Label Names: US [1,2-HEXANEDIOL] · EU [1,2-HEXANEDIOL] · CN [1,2-己二醇] · JP [1,2-ヘキサンジオール] · JP Quasi-Drug [1,2-ヘキサンジオール] ■ [2. Dermatological Mechanism of Action & Functional Role] - 1,2-HEXANEDIOL functions primarily as , in dermatological and cosmetic formulations. Classified under origin 'synthetic', it acts within the cosmetic vehicle or stratum corneum to deliver , performance and structural formulation stability. ■ [3. Global 6-Jurisdiction Regulatory Status & Safety Limits (Layer 1 & Layer 2)] - Regional Summary: KR: NONE | EU: NONE | US: NONE | CN: ALLOWED | JP: NONE | ASEAN: NONE (CN IECIC (2025) Entry No. 4 (1,2-己二醇)) - No specific Annex prohibition or numeric restriction across the 6 major jurisdictions (Permitted under general GMP safety assessment). - Official Safety & Historical Use Concentration (Layer 2): cir (reported_use, total): 5e-05~10% / cir (reported_use, bath): 0.0004~0.2% / cir (reported_use, eye): 0.3~0.7% ■ [4. Formulation Dosage Guide by Product Category (Layer 3-A)] - [aqueous_serum] Typical range: 0.5 ~ 3.0% (Median 2.0%, Ref: CIR Alkane Diols Safety Assessment & CN IECIC) — pH-independent antimicrobial humectant & solvent booster - [emulsion_cream] Typical range: 0.5 ~ 2.5% (Median 1.8%, Ref: CIR 1,2-Hexanediol Assessment) — Preservative-free system main diol booster ■ [5. Formulation Engineering, Stability & Incompatibility Matrix (Layer 3-B)] - Addition Phase: Water Phase or Cool-down Phase (< 80°C) - Optimal pH Range: pH 3.0 ~ 10.0 | Max Process Temp: Max 80°C | Electrolyte Tolerance: HIGH - Incompatibility / Caution: Concentrations > 2.2% may reduce emulsion viscosity due to interfacial partitioning; pair with 0.05% Ethylhexylglycerin - Synergy Pairings: ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN, HYDROXYACETOPHENONE, PENTYLENE GLYCOL, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL | Reference Trade Names: SymDiol® 68 (with Caprylyl Glycol), Hydrolite® 6 ■ [6. Peer-Reviewed Literature & Official Compendia Evidence] - PMID 39805611 (2024, J Microorg Control): Synergistic/antagonistic antimicrobial effects of cosmetic ingredients in combination with 1,2-hexanediol - PMID 39248485 (2024, J Vis Exp): Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidants for Cosmetic Applications Using Polyol-Based Techno - PMID 39203006 (2024, Molecules): New Natural and Sustainable Cosmetic Preservative Based on Sugarcane Straw Extract

Linked Peer-Reviewed Literature (NIH PubMed) (12)

Synergistic/antagonistic antimicrobial effects of cosmetic ingredients in combination with 1,2-hexanediol [PMID: 39805611 · 2024]
Gim H, Hong S, Park H, Im S, Kim JI · J Microorg Control (2024)

With the rise of the clean beauty trend in the cosmetics and personal care industry, consumers' interest in cosmetic ingredients, especially preservatives, continues to grow. Paraben, previously the most used preservative in cosmetics, has been excluded from many products owing to its potential risks. Therefore, a movement to lower the content of various preservatives is ongoing. One approach to achieve a suitable level of preservation is to use multifunctional ingredients as preservative boosters. In this study, we aimed to confirm the synergistic antimicrobial interactions between various cosmetic ingredients and 1,2-hexanediol, a preservative introduced as a substitute for paraben, using the checkerboard assay. We also measured the antagonistic effect by measuring the fold changes in the minimum inhibitory concentration of 1,2-hexanediol. Niacinamide, a form of vitamin B3, showed synergistic antifungal activity with 1,2-hexanediol, which lowered the content of 1,2-hexanediol in the oil-solubilized toner formulation. Among the substances, 50000 ppm of methyl methacrylate crosspolymer elevated the minimum inhibitory concentration of 1,2-hexanediol against bacteria and fungi by 2&#x2012;8 times. Through this study, we suggest applying the synergistic effects of various cosmetic ingredients in the formulation as a method to effectively reduce the content of preservatives.

Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidants for Cosmetic Applications Using Polyol-Based Technology [PMID: 39248485 · 2024]
Myat Win S, Saelee M, Myo H, Khat-Udomkiri N · J Vis Exp (2024)

The utilization of polyols as green solvents for extracting bioactive compounds from plant materials has gained attention due to their safety and inert behavior with plant bioactive chemicals. This study explores the sustainable extraction of phenolic compounds and natural antioxidants from coffee silverskin using the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) method with polyol-based solvents: glycerin, propylene glycol (PG), butylene glycol (BG), methylpropanediol (MPD), isopentyldiol (IPD), pentylene glycol, 1,2-hexanediol, and hexylene glycol (HG). A comparative analysis was conducted on conventional and non-conventional solvent extractions, focusing on their impact on the bioactive compounds of MAE, encompassing parameters such as total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activities like the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging assay (DPPH), the 2,2'-azino-bis(-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) radical scavenging assay (ABTS), and the ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP). The highest values were observed for TPC with aqueous-1,2-hexanediol extraction (52.0 &#xb1; 3.0 mg GAE/g sample), TFC with aqueous-1,2-hexanediol extraction (20.0 &#xb1; 1.7 mg QE/g sample), DPPH with aqueous-HG&#xa0;extraction (13.6 &#xb1; 0.3 mg TE/g sample), ABTS with aqueous-pentylene glycol extraction (8.2 &#xb1; 0.1 mg TE/g sample), and FRAP with aqueous-HG extraction (21.1 &#xb1; 1.3 mg Fe (II) E/g sample). This research aims to advance eco-friendly extraction technology through natural plant components, promoting sustainability by minimizing hazardous chemical use while reducing time and energy consumption, with potential applications in cosmetics.

New Natural and Sustainable Cosmetic Preservative Based on Sugarcane Straw Extract [PMID: 39203006 · 2024]
Carvalho MJ, Pedrosa SS, Pintado M, Oliveira ALS, Madureira AR · Molecules (2024)

Preservative ingredients in cosmetic formulations undertake a necessary role in the prevention of microbial contamination. In this field, there is an unmet need for natural, sustainable, and effective preservatives. Thus, the main goal of this work was to evaluate a sugarcane straw extract-based ingredient and investigate its potential as a preservative for cosmetic applications. Different ingredients were developed using several cosmetic solvents to improve the solubility of the extracted compounds. The antimicrobial activity was assessed against Staphylococcus aureus , Escherichia coli , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Candida albicans . The 1,2-hexanediol was the solvent that allowed us to achieve the ingredient (20% dry extract dispersed in 25% 1,2-hexanediol in water) with the best antimicrobial performance, showing a minimum inhibitory concentration of between 5% and 3% ( I ). The 5% ( w / v ) concentration of this ingredient complied with the USP51 standards for cosmetic preservatives. Real-time (25 &#xb0;C, 65% RH) and accelerated stability (40 &#xb0;C, 75% RH) tests were conducted to determine the ingredient stability, and it was found that one month of storage time at room temperature would be ideal for better ingredient stability and performance in terms of composition, pH, color, and antioxidant activity.

Deciphering trends in replacing preservatives in cosmetics intended for infants and sensitive population [PMID: 39153997 · 2024]
Chen T, Chang H · Sci Rep (2024)

The present study aims to investigate the current trends in replacing conventional preservatives with multifunctional ingredients with antimicrobial properties for preservation of cosmetics for infants or sensitive population, to decrease their potential for contact dermatitis. We first reviewed the labels of cosmetics purchased from the Chinese market for conventional preservatives and multifunctional ingredients with antimicrobial properties, of which the actual contents were further quantified by chromatographic methods. We identified 7 traditional preservatives (phenoxyethanol, benzoic acid (salts), methylparaben, benzyl alcohol, sorbic acid (salts), propylparaben, and methylisothiazolinone), and 11 alternative ingredients with antimicrobial activities (ethylhexylglycerin, butylene glycol, caprylyl glycol, propylene glycol, 1,2-hexanediol, p-anisic acid, hydroxyacetophenone, pentylene glycol, decylene glycol, caprylhydroxamic acid, and aminomethyl propanol) in descending order of prevalence. The contents of all identified preservatives and ingredients were either below regulatory limits or in the range that is generally regarded to be safe. Further challenge with microorganisms indicated irrespective of the composition of preservation systems, product preservation could be compromised under test conditions. We conclude that multifunctional ingredients with antimicrobial properties in cosmetics have the potential to completely replace or significantly reduce the use of traditional preservatives while retaining comparative preservative efficacy. Future attentions may need to be shifted to the safety of those multifunctional ingredients with antimicrobial properties.

Influence of Panax ginseng formulation on skin microbiota: A randomized, split face comparative clinical study [PMID: 35509819 · 2022]
Hou JH, Shin H, Shin H, Kil Y, Yang DH, Park MK, Lee W, Seong JY, Lee SH, Cho HS, Yuk SH, Lee KY · J Ginseng Res (2022)

Skin microbiota is important for maintenance of skin homeostasis; however, its disturbance may cause an increase in pathogenic microorganisms. Therefore, we aimed to develop a red ginseng formulation that can selectively promote beneficial bacteria. The effects of red ginseng formulation on microorganism growth were analyzed by comparing the growth rates of Staphylococcus aureus , S.&#xa0;epidermidis , and Cutibacterium acnes . Various preservatives mixed with red ginseng formulation were evaluated to determine the ideal composition for selective growth promotion of S.&#xa0;epidermidis . Red ginseng formulation with selected preservative was loaded into a biocompatible polymer mixture and applied to the faces of 20 female subjects in the clinical trial to observe changes in the skin microbiome. Red ginseng formulation promoted the growth of S.&#xa0;aureus and S.&#xa0;epidermidis compared to fructooligosaccharide. When 1,2-hexanediol was applied with red ginseng formulation, only S.&#xa0;epidermidis showed selective growth. The analysis of the release rates of ginsenoside-Rg1 and -Re revealed that the exact content of Pluronic F-127 was around 11%. The application of hydrogel resulted in a decrease in C.&#xa0;acnes in all subjects. In subjects with low levels of S.&#xa0;epidermidis , the distribution of S.&#xa0;epidermidis was significantly increased with the application of hydrogel formulation and total microbial species of subjects decreased by 50% during the clinical trial. We confirmed that red ginseng formulation with 1,2-hexanediol can help maintain skin homeostasis through improvement of skin microbiome.

Impact of Alkanediols on Stratum Corneum Lipids and Triamcinolone Acetonide Skin Penetration [PMID: 34575527 · 2021]
Sigg M, Daniels R · Pharmaceutics (2021)

Alkanediols are widely used as multifunctional ingredients in dermal formulations. In addition to their preservative effect, considering their possible impact on drug penetration is also essential for their use. In the present study, the influence of 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol, 1,2-pentanediol, 1,2-hexanediol and 1,2-octanediol on the skin penetration of triamcinolone acetonide from four different semisolid formulations was investigated. Furthermore, confocal Raman spectroscopy measurements were performed to examine the influence of the alkanediols on stratum corneum lipid content and order. Alkanediols were found to increase the penetration of triamcinolone acetonide. However, the extent depends strongly on the formulation used. In certain formulations, 1,2-pentanediol showed the highest effect, while in others the penetration-enhancing effect increased with the alkyl chain length of the alkanediol used. None of the tested alkanediols extracted lipids from the stratum corneum nor reduced its thickness. Notwithstanding the above, the longer-chained alkanediols cause the lipids to be converted to a more disordered state, which favors drug penetration. This behavior could not be detected for the shorter-chained alkanediols. Therefore, their penetration-enhancing effect is supposed to be related to an interaction with the hydrophilic regions of the stratum corneum.

Assessment of the potential risk of 1,2-hexanediol using phytotoxicity and cytotoxicity testing [PMID: 32505050 · 2020]
Song U, Kim J · Ecotoxicol Environ Saf (2020)

1,2-Hexanediol is commonly used in the cosmetic industry as a preservative, an emollient, and a moisturizing agent. However, studies on the scientific toxicity of 1,2-hexanediol are limited. In this study, we evaluated the potential toxic effects of 1,2-hexanediol using phytotoxicity and cytotoxicity testing methods. Phytotoxicity tests using Brassica campestris subsp. napus and Latuca sativa L. showed that 1,2-hexanediol significantly inhibited seed germination and root elongation at the lowest concentration (0.1%). Additionally, plants treated with 1,2-hexanediol failed to survive. In cytotoxicity tests, RAW 264.7 and HK-2&#xa0;cells treated with 1.0% 1,2-Hexanediol showed a significant decline in viability, followed by death. Since most personal care products contain &gt;2% 1,2-hexanediol, it is highly likely that 1,2-hexanediol is toxic to humans. Moreover, if 1,2-hexanediol enters the human body either via oral intake or through an open wound, it could have critical effects. Furthermore, upon release into the environment, 1,2-hexanediol could cause considerable damage to plants and other organisms. Therefore, further investigation of 1,2-hexanediol is required to prevent toxicity to humans and other living organisms.

Topical delivery of niacinamide: Influence of neat solvents [PMID: 32057889 · 2020]
Iliopoulos F, Sil BC, Monjur Al Hossain ASM, Moore DJ, Lucas RA, Lane ME · Int J Pharm (2020)

Niacinamide (NIA) has been widely used in cosmetic and personal care formulations for several skin conditions. Permeation of topical NIA has been confirmed in a number of studies under infinite dose conditions. However, there is limited information in the literature regarding permeation of NIA following application of topical formulations in amounts that reflect the real-life use of such products by consumers. The aim of the present work was therefore to investigate skin delivery of NIA from single solvent systems in porcine skin under finite dose conditions. A secondary aim was to probe the processes underlying the previously reported low recovery of NIA following in vitro permeation and mass balance studies. The solubility and stability of NIA in various single solvent systems was examined. The solvents investigated included Transcutol&#xae; P (TC), propylene glycol (PG), 1-2 hexanediol (HEX), 1-2 pentanediol (1-2P), 1-5 pentanediol (1-5P), 1-3 butanediol (1-3B), glycerol (GLY) and dimethyl isosorbide (DMI). Skin permeation and deposition of the molecule was investigated in full thickness porcine skin in vitro finite dose Franz-type diffusion experiments followed by mass balance studies. Stability of NIA for 72&#xa0;h in the solvents was confirmed. The solubility of NIA in the solvents ranged from 82.9&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;0.8 to 311.9&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;4.5&#xa0;mg/mL. TC delivered the highest percentage permeation of NIA at 24&#xa0;h, 32.6&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;12.1% of the applied dose. Low total recovery of NIA after mass balance studies was observed for some vehicles, with values ranging from 55.2&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;12.8% to 106.3&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;2.3%. This reflected the formation of a number of NIA degradation by-products in the receptor phase during the permeation studies. Identification of other vehicles for synergistic enhancement of NIA skin delivery will be the subject of future work.

3-O-ethyl-l-ascorbic acid: Characterisation and investigation of single solvent systems for delivery to the skin [PMID: 31517290 · 2019]
Iliopoulos F, Sil BC, Moore DJ, Lucas RA, Lane ME · Int J Pharm X (2019)

l-ascorbic acid (AA), commonly known as vitamin C, has been widely used in topical formulations for many years as an antioxidant and anti-aging ingredient. However, the physicochemical properties of AA are not optimal for skin uptake and the molecule is also unstable, readily undergoing oxidation on exposure to air. The compound 3-o-ethyl-l-ascorbic acid (EA) has been developed as a stable vitamin C derivative and has been used in topical products. The aims of this work were to conduct a comprehensive characterisation of physicochemical properties of EA as well as to investigate the influence of various neat solvents on EA skin delivery. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), mass spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were used to characterise the molecule. The pK a of the compound and the partition coefficient logP (o/w) were experimentally determined. A new HPLC method for analysis of the molecule was also developed and validated. A number of solvents for topical preparations were selected based on their wide use as excipients in topical formulations, their potential to act as skin penetration enhancers and their favourable safety profiles. The solubility and stability of EA was examined. Skin permeation of the molecule in full thickness porcine skin in vitro was investigated using Franz-type diffusion cells. The melting point, log P (o/w) value and pK a value of EA were determined to be 114.39&#x202f;&#xb1;&#x202f;0.5&#x202f;&#xb0;C, -1.07&#x202f;&#xb1;&#x202f;0.03 and 7.72&#x202f;&#xb1;&#x202f;0.01 respectively. Skin penetration of EA was evident for the following vehicles 1,2 hexanediol (HEX), glycerol (GLY), propylene glycol (PG), 1,2 pentanediol (1-2P), isopropyl alcohol (IPA), propylene glycol monolaurate (PGML) and propylene glycol monocaprylate (PGMC). Skin uptake but no permeation through the skin was observed for Transcutol&#xae; (TC) and dipropylene glycol (DiPG), while no penetration was observed for the solvents 1,5 pentanediol (1-5P) and tripropylene glycol (TriPG). The findings of the permeation experiments confirm the potential of simple formulations to deliver EA to the skin. Studies are ongoing to identify complex vehicles for synergistic enhancement of EA skin penetration. To our knowledge this is the first study to conduct a comprehensive characterization of EA and examine its skin uptake and permeation properties in porcine skin.

Insights into the structure of sunscreen lotions: a small-angle neutron scattering study [PMID: 35423975 · 2021]
Mansour OT, Venero DA · RSC Adv (2021)

Sunscreen lotions and creams are arguably the most popular products used to protect the skin against harmful UV radiation. Several studies have been conducted to untangle the internal microstructure of creams and lotions. However, the effect of UV filters and other materials such as preservatives, on the internal microstructure and the aesthetics of these products is not yet fully understood. Using small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), we were able to investigate the effect of adding the commonly used organic UV filters (avobenzone (AVB), ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EMC), ethylhexyl triazone (EHT) and bemotrizinol (BMT)) and the water soluble preservatives (1,5-pentanediol (1,5-PD) and 1,2-hexanediol (1,2-HD)), on the internal architecture and microstructure of an oil-in-water (o/w) based sunscreen lotion. Our findings highlight the complexities of these formulations, and how the introduction of different additives could influence their structure and possibly their performance.

The effect of alkanediols on the release of triamcinolone acetonide from semisolid dosage forms [PMID: 34216765 · 2021]
Sigg M, Daniels R · Int J Pharm (2021)

Alkanediols are frequently used as alternative antimicrobial preservatives for dermal formulations. However, these substances can also have an influence on the biopharmaceutical properties of the applied preparations. Therefore, the influence 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol, 1,2-pentanediol, 1,2-hexanediol and 1,2-octanediol on the release of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) from four different commonly used semi-solid vehicles was investigated. In addition, the solubility of TAA in aqueous alkanediol solutions was evaluated. It was observed that its solubility increases as a function of chain length of the alkanediol, with exception of 1,2-octanediol. This can be related to the corresponding solubility parameters. Despite alkanediols increase the aqueous solubility of TAA, polarization microscopic images revealed that a significant amount of the drug is present in the suspended state in all formulations. Therefore, TAA release was proportional to the square root of time, indicating Higuchi kinetic. Alkanediols modify the release of TAA depending on the used base. The addition of alkanediols to the hydrogel formulation result in a slightly augmented release rate of the drug with increasing chain length of the added alkanediol. In contrast, alkanediols having longer chain lengths diminish the TAA release rate from all tested creams. Consequently, TAA release revealed to be partially inequivalent upon the addition of alkanediols.

Investigations on Alkanediols as Alternative Preservatives in a Nonionic Hydrophilic Cream [PMID: 33233527 · 2020]
Sigg M, Daniels R · Pharmaceutics (2020)

Alkanediols are often used as alternative antimicrobial preservatives for dermal formulations, e.g., hydrophilic creams. These substances show an antimicrobial effect due to their amphiphilic structure. At the same time, their amphiphilic behavior enables various interactions with the cream base itself. Therefore, the effect of four different alkanediols, namely 1,2-pentanediol, 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol (hexylene glycol), 1,2-hexanediol, and 1,2-octanediol on the physical stability of a nonionic hydrophilic cream was investigated. Further, the incorporation of the alkanediols into lamellar structures of the cream was evaluated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements. The interaction with the mixed crystals of the cream was found to increase with raising alkyl chain length of the added alkanediol. As a result, consistency and stability of the cream are slightly impaired. A test for efficacy of antimicrobial preservation according to the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph.Eur.) revealed that the antimicrobial activity is directly linked to the length of the alkyl chain of the alkanediols. 2-Methyl-2,4-pentanediol differs from both findings. This compound has non-vicinal hydroxy groups which result in a reduced amphiphilicity compared to the others. Consequently, it has a smaller impact on the colloidal structure of the cream and shows a comparatively low antimicrobial activity.

Frequently Asked Questions (AEO Position 0)

Q1. What are the official 7-track regulatory label names for 1,2-HEXANEDIOL?
Standard label names are US PCPC INCI: '1,2-HEXANEDIOL', EU CosIng: '1,2-HEXANEDIOL', KR MFDS: '1,2-HEXANEDIOL (KR MFDS Registered)', CN NMPA IECIC: '1,2-己二醇', and JP JCIA: '1,2-ヘキサンジオール'.
Q2. Is 1,2-HEXANEDIOL restricted or permitted in EU, US, KR, CN, and JP cosmetics?
Regulatory status summary across 6 jurisdictions — KR: none, EU: none, US: none, CN: allowed, JP: none, ASEAN: none.
Q3. What is the typical formulation concentration and optimal pH window for 1,2-HEXANEDIOL?
In aqueous_serum systems, 1,2-HEXANEDIOL is typically formulated between 0.5% and 3% (median 2%), with an optimal stability window of pH 3–10.
Q4. What are the known formulation incompatibilities and synergy pairings for 1,2-HEXANEDIOL?
Recommended synergy pairings include ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN, HYDROXYACETOPHENONE, PENTYLENE GLYCOL, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL. Key incompatibilities to avoid: Concentrations > 2.2% may reduce emulsion viscosity due to interfacial partitioning; pair with 0.05% Ethylhexylglycerin.